Because that is what he wanted Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT 860-535-2080 www.fpdc.com
> On Jul 19, 2014, at 5:34 AM, John Drucker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Why ? > > John Drucker - Mobile Email > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Cell/Text 732-904-6823 > > > Todd - Work <[email protected]> wrote: > > My favorite is "home rule" (aka we can make up whatever the heck we want) > places like Texas. Did a small job for a company in a place around Houston. > Was supposed to be a small group home designed to 13D. A new Fire Marshal > came in half way through the project and changed the requirements to 13R and > rejected the previously approved plans. > > Todd G Williams, PE > Fire Protection Design/Consulting > Stonington, CT > www.fpdc.com<http://www.fpdc.com> > 860-535-2080 (ofc) > >> On Jul 18, 2014, at 10:43 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> I was just thinking about that and all I got is , out of nowhere pops a >> brilliant young engineering intern, on a Spring Morning in Kansas, barefoot, >> w/ her blue jeans rolled up to her knees, hollering out pump pitot readings, >> so, sorry Ron. >> >>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 9:35 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Okay you explain the $40-50k hit to the bottom line >>> >>> Ron fletcher Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 7:32 PM, "Brad Casterline" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Best not to dwell on any one project too much >>>> >>>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 9:28 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Can't say how much this pisses me off. >>>>> >>>>> Ron fletcher Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 7:19 PM, "Brad Casterline" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> You're alright like most of us the psychology part of sprinkler work >>>>>> just makes you want to throw up in your mouth a little bit , right? >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 9:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How about everything is per code except we have two pumps rather than >>>>>>> one.and we have 4000 GM at 160 psi instead of.4000 gpm at 165 psi. Most >>>>>>> ignorant thing I have ever seen. Just found out the chief told plan >>>>>>> reviewer no more written correspondence. I guess because they don't >>>>>>> want a written orecord of their stupidity. Please forgive my >>>>>>> frustration but I just don't know where to go from here.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ron fletcher Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Jul 18, 2014, at 4:24 PM, "John Drucker - Home" >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ron, et.al. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I don't know the particulars of your situation but we have a saying; >>>>>>>> there's >>>>>>>> your side, their side and the truth. Perhaps there's an issue with >>>>>>>> the code >>>>>>>> itself, a local amendment or interpretation. There's got to be >>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>> driving this. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Case in point about a reference standard, NFPA-72 speaks of wall >>>>>>>> mounted >>>>>>>> smoke detectors/alarms and calls out a distance yet the illustration >>>>>>>> in the >>>>>>>> annex is worded differently than the code. > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
