It is not fire treated. I already tried that route. I feel like 225 would be acceptable. Which also begs the question, would ex cov be acceptable? It is unobstructed construction. I believe the ex cov sprinklers are allowed for unobstructed combustible.
Just a rare situation. Travis Mack, SET MFP Design, LLC "Follow" us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 Send large files to MFP Design via: https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign Sent from my iPhone > On May 6, 2015, at 9:21 AM, Todd - Work <[email protected]> wrote: > > Good question. I think you could go to 225, but the Book doesn't address it. I > assume the plywood is not fire treated? Most of the times I see this > arrangement, the plywood is treated. > > Todd G Williams, PE > Fire Protection Design/Consulting > Stonington, CT > www.fpdc.com > 860-535-2080 (ofc) > 860-608-4559 (cell) > Sent using CloudMagic > [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2] > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 12:04 PM, [email protected] > <[email protected]> wrote: > For an attic with light gauge steel trusses spaced 24" on center and plywood > deck sheathing, would the spacing be limited to 130 sq ft or would 225 be > acceptable? Slope is 3:12. > > Travis Mack, SET > MFP Design, LLC > "Follow" us on Facebook: > https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692 > Send large files to MFP Design via: > https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign > > Sent from my iPhone > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
