Thanks for the reply. Here is the best I can do to articulate my thoughts.

1) The AHJ is demanding an Auto Standpipe in the Parking Garage and I do
not know why....but he told the owner that is what he required.
2) The PG has only 2 standpipes so no matter what the PG will flow a
maximum of 750 gpm
3) The PG S/Ps are DRY  so they will have to be separate systems to some
degree, I was going to tie the FDC lines together and use one FDC
4) I do not understand the reference in NFPA #14 7.10.1.1 says "Fire Area"
and the IBC references "Area" in the table I sent you. If that term does
not apply to this situation, I would like to understand for future
reference what it applies to. If it does apply, I think we are fine to
separate the two....
5)  If the High Rise s/p's are Auto Wet and the Pg are Auto Dry, which they
are in this case, what doe that do to interconnection, calcs etc? I have
never ran into this situation before.



Greg






Greg McGahan
Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
1160 McKenzie Road
Cantonment, FL 32533
850-937-1850
fax 850-937-1852

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Steve Leyton <[email protected]>
wrote:

> I've been out of my office for over a week, so apologies for not
> acknowledging the calls for my expertise.  I gotta say if it's come down to
> me, you're all a lot more desperate than I thought ...
>
> I notice replies from others on this thread and I think I concur with
> consensus.   If these are two truly separated buildings (at least as
> defined by code), are you proposing two separate standpipe systems?
> Separate response addresses, separate FDC’s?  Or is this going to be one
> universal system.  Any way you look at it, the parking structure isn’t
> sprinklered and code would say that you need a Class III with 1,250 GPM
> demand.  The tower would be 750, so garage obviously more demanding.    If
> you’re proposing a single automatic water supply/single system
> configuration, then I’d say it has to meet the 1,250, HOWEVER …
>
> Why is the garage required to be automatic.   By definition and open
> structure, even one taller than 75’ isn’t a high-rise.  Code allows up to
> 12 tiers without sprinklers if I recall correctly, so the “usual” rules
> don’t necessarily apply.  My guess is that manual dry is adequate – at
> least per code.   So my answer would be that you should look into a 1,250
> GPM manual-dry and a 750 GPM auto-wet for the tower (assuming only two
> stairs).  Is the AHJ or another stakeholder requiring auto-dry in the
> garage?
>
> The foregoing is my opinion only and does not necessarily represent the
> opinion or intent of the NFPA 14 Technical Committee on Standpipe and Hose
> Systems.
>
> SML
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard
> Matsuda
> Sent: Monday, June 29, 2015 9:50 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: standpipes in fire separated building
>
> Greg,I believe the intent of NFPA-14 is to include flow from all the
> standpipes within a building that the fire dept would connect to in a fire
> emergency. If the floors in the parking garage do not communicate with
> hallways and doors to the floors in the high-rise building, then the fire
> dept will not connect to the standpipes in the parking garage to fight a
> theoretical fire in the high-rise...and visa-versa.Just my opinion...Mr.
> Leyton probably could answer this for you.rick matsuda
>
>
>      On Monday, June 29, 2015 10:06 AM, Greg McGahan <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>  What about this section?
>
> A.7.10.1.1 If a water supply system supplies more than one building or
> more than one fire area, the total supply can be calculated based on the
> single building or fire area requiring the greatest number of standpipes.
> For a discussion of use by the fire department of fire department
> connections, see NFPA 13E <http://codesonline.nfpa.org/a/c.ref/NFC13E/book
> >
> , *Recommended Practice for Fire Department Operations in Properties
> Protected by Sprinkler and Standpipe Systems*.
>
> Greg McGahan
> Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
> 1160 McKenzie Road
> Cantonment, FL 32533
> 850-937-1850
> fax 850-937-1852
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Pete Schwab <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > If the piping supply is connected (common supply piping) then I would
> > say you have to calculate until you reach 1250 GPM (since the garage
> > is not sprinklered).
> >
> > 7.10.1.2.3* Common supply piping shall be calculated and sized to
> > provide the required flow rate for all standpipes connected to such
> > supply piping, with the total not to exceed the maximum flow demand in
> > 7.10.1.1.5.
> >
> > A.7.10.1.2.3 Flow is added at nodes in a standpipe system in
> > 250 gpm (946 L/min) increments without requiring additional flow,
> > which might occur from higher pressures at that node (balancing the
> > system). The common supply piping should be hydraulically calculated
> > based on the required flow rate [500, 750, 1000, or 1250 gpm (1893,
> > 2840, 3785, or
> > 4732 L/min)] for the standpipe system. The calculated pressure for the
> > standpipe system does not have to be balanced at the point of
> > connection to the common supply piping.
> >
> > It should be noted that the above is my opinion.  It has not been
> > processed as a formal interpretation in accordance with the NFPA
> > Regulations Governing Committee Projects and should therefore not be
> > considered, nor relied upon, as the official position of the NFPA or
> > its Committees.
> >
> > Peter Schwab
> > VP of Purchasing and Engineering technologies
> >
> > Wayne Automatic Fire Sprinklers Inc.
> > 222 Capitol Court
> > Ocoee, Fl 34761
> >
> > Mobile: (407) 468-8248
> > Direct: (407) 877-5570
> > Fax: (407) 656-8026
> >
> > www.waynefire.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Greg
> > McGahan
> > Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2015 7:49 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: standpipes in fire separated building
> >
> > I will find out tomorrow but this is one lot so I presume it is a fire
> > wall. The separation into two different buildings appears to not be
> > necessary per the excerpt from 14. They appear to meet definition of
> > fire AREA. At least that is indeed what I hope.
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > > On Jun 28, 2015, at 10:21 AM, John Drucker - Home <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Greg,
> > >
> > > So the garage is classified as a separate building and the two
> > > systems
> > are independent ?  Two (2) Hour Rated Wall needs clarification, if
> > it’s a fire wall or PARTY WALL (See 706.1.1 below) then two separate
> buildings.
> > Ask the architect. That’s the key.
> > >
> > > 706.1 General. Each portion of a building separated by one or more
> > > fire walls that comply with the provisions of this section shall be
> > > considered a separate building. The extent and location of such fire
> > > walls shall provide a complete separation separation. Where a fire
> > > wall also separates occupancies that are required to be separated by
> > > a fire barrier wall, the most restrictive requirements of each
> > > separation shall apply.
> > >
> > > 706.1.1 Party walls. Any wall located on a lot line between adjacent
> > > buildings, which is used or adapted for joint service between the
> > > two buildings, shall be constructed as a fire wall in accordance
> > > with Section 706.
> > > Party walls shall be constructed without openings and shall create
> > > separate buildings.
> > >
> > >
> > > Here's the IBC/IFC Code Sections;
> > >
> > > [F] 905.2 Installation standard. Standpipe systems shall be
> > > installed in accordance with this section and NFPA 14.
> > >
> > > 905.3.1 Height. Class III standpipe systems shall be installed
> > > throughout buildings where the floor level of the highest story is
> > > located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) above the lowest level of the
> > > fire department vehicle access, or where the floor level of the
> > > lowest story is located more than 30 feet (9144 mm) below the
> > > highest level of fire department vehicle access.
> > > Exceptions:
> > > 1. Class I standpipes are allowed in buildings equipped throughout
> > > with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section
> > > 903.3.1.1 or 903.3.1.2.
> > > 2. Class I manual standpipes are allowed in open parking garages
> > > where the highest floor is located not more than 150 feet (45 720
> > > mm) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access.
> > > 3. Class I manual dry standpipes are allowed in open parking garages
> > > that are subject to freezing temperatures, provided that the hose
> > > connections are located as required for Class II standpipes in
> > > accordance with Section 905.5.
> > > 4. Class I standpipes are allowed in basements equipped throughout
> > > with an automatic sprinkler system.
> > > 5. In determining the lowest level of fire department vehicle
> > > access, it shall not be required to consider:
> > > 5.1. Recessed loading docks for four vehicles or less, and 5.2.
> > > Conditions where topography makes access from the fire department
> > > vehicle to the building impractical or impossible.
> > >
> > > [F] 905.4.2 Interconnection. In buildings where more than one
> > > standpipe is provided, the standpipes shall be interconnected in
> > > accordance with NFPA 14.
> > >
> > > 2014 NFPA-14
> > >
> > > 7.10 Flow Rates.
> > >
> > > 7.10.1 Class I and Class III Systems.
> > >
> > > 7.10.1.1* Flow Rate.
> > >
> > > 7.10.1.1.1 For Class I and Class III systems, the minimum flow rate
> > > for the hydraulically most remote standpipe shall be
> > > 500 gpm (1893 L/min), through the two most remote 21⁄2 in.
> > > (65 mm) outlets, and the calculation procedure shall be in
> > > accordance with 7.10.1.2.
> > >
> > > 7.10.1.1.2 Where a horizontal standpipe on a Class I or Class III
> > > system supplies three or more hose connections on any floor, the
> > > minimum flow rate for the hydraulically most demanding horizontal
> > > standpipe shall be 750 gpm
> > > (2840 L/min), and the calculation procedure shall be in accordance
> > > with 7.10.1.2.2.
> > >
> > > 7.10.1.1.3 The minimum flow rate for additional standpipes shall be
> > > 250 gpm (946 L/min) per standpipe for buildings with floor areas
> > > that do not exceed 80,000 ft2 (7432 m2) per floor. For buildings
> > > that exceed 80,000 ft2 (7432m2) per floor, the minimum flow rate for
> > > the additional standpipes shall be
> > > 500 gpm (1893 L/min) for the second standpipe and 250 gpm
> > > (946 L/min) for the third standpipe if the additional flow is
> > > required for an unsprinklered building.
> > >
> > > 7.10.1.1.5 The maximum flow rate shall be 1000 gpm
> > > (3785 L/min) for buildings that are sprinklered throughout, in
> > > accordance with NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler
> > > Systems, and 1250 gpm (4731 L/min) for buildings that are not
> > > sprinklered throughout, in accordance with NFPA 13.
> > >
> > > Hope that helps,
> > >
> > >
> > > John Drucker, CET
> > > Assistant Construction Official
> > > Fire Protection Subcode Official
> > > Building/Fire/Electrical Inspector
> > > Borough of Red Bank
> > > Red Bank, New Jersey
> > > Email: [email protected]
> > > Cell/Text: 732-904-6823
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sprinklerforum
> > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> > > Travis Mack
> > > Sent: Friday, June 26, 2015 11:14 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: standpipes in fire separated building
> > >
> > > Look in the IBC and see if that 2 hour wall meets the separation
> > requirements for a fire separation.
> > >
> > > If so, I think you should be able to treat as separate buildings for
> > > the
> > standpipe system.
> > >
> > > Travis Mack, SET
> > > MFP Design, LLC
> > > "Follow" us on Facebook:
> > > https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692
> > > Send large files to MFP Design via:
> > > https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > >> On Jun 26, 2015, at 7:15 PM, Greg McGahan <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am looking a t a high rise building with 2 stair wells attached
> > >> to a
> > >> 7 story parking garage that is not protected. the Parking garage
> > >> will have two stairwells and be served by automatic dry standpipes.
> > >> The Parking Garage and the High Rise are separated by a 2 hour rated
> wall.
> > >>
> > >> Question: Do I have to calculate all 4 standpipes simultaneously or
> > >> can I calc each set separately due to the fire separation between
> > >> the
> > two areas?
> > >>
> > >> Thank You,
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Greg McGahan
> > >> Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com>
> > >> 1160 McKenzie Road
> > >> Cantonment, FL 32533
> > >> 850-937-1850
> > >> fax 850-937-1852
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > >> [email protected]
> > >> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firespri
> > >> nk
> > >> l
> > >> er.org
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > > kl
> > > er.org
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprin
> > > kl
> > > er.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> > er.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to