Todd,

Pipe schedules using 3/4 - 1 - 1 1/4 were common in the early days. I have
done many re-vamp jobs around Atlanta where it was required by NFPA 13 to
change all the 3/4 pipe to 1". I never saw a 3/4 - 1 - 1 but it is possible
from 1884. I don't know how that would calculate unless you have a great
water supply. My 2 cents.

Lamar Vaughn

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Matthew J Willis <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Ah.., but the crux is, Are you working there under 25 or 13?
>
> R/
> Matt
>
> Matthew J. Willis
> Project Manager
> Rapid Fire Protection Inc.
> *NEW ADDRESS*
> 1530 Samco Road
> Rapid City, SD 57702
> Office-605.348.2342
> Direct Line-605.593.5063
> Cell-605.391.2733
> Fax:-605.348.0108
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Art Tiroly
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 6:25 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: Old pipe schedule
>
> What is the sprinkler spacing?
> Staggered spacing was quite common before 1940.
> Newer heads installed?
> High pressure water supply connected?
> It likely will barely do .10 density or maybe .15 with moderate pressure.
> FM used to allow 3-5 psi at end head for pipe schedule.
>
> Art Tiroly
> ATCO Fire Protection
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> [email protected]]
> On Behalf Of Todd Williams
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 7:22 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Old pipe schedule
>
> I am working on a project in a mill that was constructed in 1884. On the
> top floor, the branch piping is 3/4 - 1 - 1. Was there an older version of
> pipe schedule that allowed smaller pipe or is this just undersized?
> Hopefully some of you history buffs (or at least those with a bunch of old
> stuff) would know.
>
> Todd G Williams, PE Fire Protection Design/Consulting Stonington, CT
> 860-535-2080 (ofc) 860-608-4559 (cell)
> Sent using CloudMagic
> [https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=6.0.64&pv=8.2]
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to