That's pretty much the issue now isn't it? In most of the jurisdictions where we work, if the work is divided as we are discussing, then to hydrostatic test and two flushes are required. The problem for the owner is when a leak occurs or some sort of inspection card goes missing, and then you have two different contractors pointing their fingers at each other.
Steve -------- Original message -------- From: Scott Futrell <[email protected]> Date: 3/29/2016 7:15 PM (GMT-08:00) To: [email protected] Subject: RE: UG 5 ft outside building Who flushes all of it in accordance with 13 & 24? Who accepts the liability for all of it? Scott Office: (763) 425-1001 x 202 Cell: (612) 759-5556 -----Original Message----- From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Verhei Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2016 7:00 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: UG 5 ft outside building In Puget Sound I've seen sprinkler (overhead) contractor providing a brand name stainless product that extends a couple feet outside footing, that the underground contractor installs as part of their work. Best Bruce Verhei _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
