Don wins. The TC intentionally restricted the allowance then said hmmm we seems to be standing in a pile of manure and despite it being embarrassing reversed their decision the next cycle. I applaud not allowing the ego (aka avoidance of embarrassing actions) to dictate their course of action.
So for those working with the 2013 edition, discuss the equivalency rule based on the 2016 edition for current jobs. Roland Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering American Fire Sprinkler Assn. --- Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives Dallas, TX http://www.firesprinkler.org <http://www.firesprinkler.org/> > On May 3, 2016, at 11:22 AM, Don Casey <[email protected]> wrote: > > A rethink.....i think > > -----Original Message----- > From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Greg McGahan > Sent: 2016/05/03 2:22 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: NFPA 13 2013 ed bathroom sprinklers > > Does anyone know why the 2010 Ed and 2016 Ed of 13 allow the omission of > sprinklers in bathrooms in "Dwelling Units" but the > 2013 > Ed > limits the omission to bathrooms in hotel/motels? > > > > Greg McGahan > Living Water Fire Protection, LLC <http://www.livingwaterfp.com> > 1160 McKenzie Road > Cantonment, FL 32533 > 850-937-1850 > fax 850-937-1852 > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org > _______________________________________________ > Sprinklerforum mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org _______________________________________________ Sprinklerforum mailing list [email protected] http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
