Too bad they don't know why.
If they did they would scootch it up a little-- something to hang their hat
on AND say this is +/- X many percent conservative.
I say vote the stodgy old TC members out-- we need some green--- any
questions call me at BR 5- wtevr
On Nov 5, 2016 5:09 PM, <[email protected]> wrote:

> Military (USACOE) still has 20fps for overhead pipe and 10fps for
> underground
>
>
>
> Ed
>
> Aero
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected].
> org] *On Behalf Of *Todd Williams
> *Sent:* Friday, November 04, 2016 4:30 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: velocity in pipes
>
>
>
> I see this every once in a while in engineer's specs. Most likely came
> from the period when FM had a 20 fps restriction.
>
> Todd G Williams, PE
>
> Fire Protection Design/Consulting
>
> Stonington, CT
>
> 860-535-2080 (ofc)
>
> 860-608-4559 (cell)
>
>
>
> via Newton Mail
> <https://cloudmagic.com/k/d/mailapp?ct=ti&cv=9.2.5&pv=9.3.5&source=email_footer_2>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:25 PM, Gary Stites <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> San Jose (Do you know the way?) limits to 20 fps. Huge pet peeve of mine...
>
>
>
> https://www.sanjoseca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/7452
>
>
>
> Gary
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Brad Casterline <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> But as a bench mark, at 37 ft/sec is where Darcy-Weisbach starts exceeding
> Hazen-Williams in psi/ft friction loss.
>
> Brad
>
> On Nov 4, 2016 6:03 PM, "Brad Casterline" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> 2+2=4
>
> Like Roland says ~velocity is self-limiting~ meaning you can get it going
> as fast as the supply pressure allows.
> The only "20" I have heard cities concern themselves with is city water
> residual pressure in their pipes.
>
> Thanks for the nod Rocci :)
>
> brad
>
> On Nov 4, 2016 5:52 PM, "Rocci Cetani 3" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We have a situation where half of a building is exposed expanded plastics
> on rack storage and the other half is storage on pallets of exposed
> expanded plastics. With the pump we need the pipe is large on the rack side
> (8” mains and 3” branchlines) on the pallet storage its 6” mains and I can
> get down to 1.5” branch lines but it jacks the velocity up to around 30-35
> in the 1.5” pipe. I don’t believe NFPA has a standard on velocities in
> pipes but I know a lot of cities don’t allow over 20 ft. per second. What’s
> a good bench mark not to go above? I feel a Brad explanation coming with
> lots of math…….
>
> Thanks in advance for all your answers.
>
> *Rocci Cetani III, **CET*
>
> *Designer*
>
> *Water-Based Fire Protections Systems Layout, Nicet Level III*
>
> *Northern California Fire Protection Services Inc.*
>
> 16840 Joleen Way Bldg. A
>
> Morgan Hill, CA 93037
>
> P-(408) 776-1580 EXT.111
>
> F-(408) 776-1590
>
> [email protected]
>
> www.norcalfire.com
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any document accompanying it may
> contain confidential information
>
> belonging to the sender. The information is intended only for the use of
> individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or
> the employee or agent responsible to deliver this message to the intended
> recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying or taking
> of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
> immediately notify us by telephone to arrange for return of the documents.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Gary Stites
>
> *805-769-GMAN*
>
>
>
> RLH <http://www.rlhfp.com>
>
> WWW.K25.Rocks
>
> Pandora Station <http://www.pandora.com/?sc=sh43464983213902734>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.
> org
>
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to