Went to the site yesterday... unlike the construction drawings the contractor 
infilled the area above the windows with EFIS. The FM guide Craig mentioned did 
have a procedure for wall wetting which would work if I didn't need 2hr 
separation.

David Toshio Williams, PE
                LHB, Inc. Performance•Driven•Design

...sent from the cloud through the tubes!

On Nov 8, 2016, at 12:46 AM, Bruce Verhei 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

See Window Sprinklers in index. This line in the referenced sections is 
important: .... listed window sprinkler.

Window sprinklers are installed per install sheet.

Horizontal mullions. Last time I looked, no.

And the other comment that always comes up, "it's only common sense
that the ceiling Sprinklers can be spaced a foot or two farther of the wall. 
No. Window sprinklers provide zero area protection.

Best.



On Nov 7, 2016, at 11:43, David Williams 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Scott (and others),

I agree with you that this is not a matter of “actually” providing any 
equivalent fire protection to a 2 hr wall. This is checking the box on a Code 
requirement. That being said, I don’t see this provision significantly reducing 
the hazard of a fully sprinklered skywalk running through a fully sprinklered 
open parking garage, but it will make our political leaders and AHJ happy by 
doing “this” and not installing fire doors at the property line.

Just trying to have a defensible(?) position on the way I approach this by 
looking at the “wetting of the entire wall”  portion of this. I appreciate the 
feedback and all the interesting discussions that I usually just lurk around on!

David Toshio Williams, PE/FPE, LEED-AP O+M
(218) 279-2436 direct | (218) 310-2446 cell
LHB, Inc. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Scott Futrell
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 1:20 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wall Wetting per IBC - 2012, Chapter 31, 3104.5 Exception 1

David,

I’ll stand by what I wrote, to the best of my knowledge there hasn’t been 
testing to prove sprinklers as an effective strategy or an equivalency for 
rated construction.  Window sprinklers for glazing are the exception, but to 
use a ‘water curtain’ in any manner in lieu of a required fire barrier, fire 
separation, whatever has not been tested.  And then there is still the what if 
they are out of service for any reason scenario? It has been used and 
published, but not tested.

I apologize if I’m not following…

Scott

Office: (763) 425-1001 x 2
Cell: (612) 759-5556

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of David Williams
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:52 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Wall Wetting per IBC - 2012, Chapter 31, 3104.5 Exception 1

I will note we don’t even have glazing in the walls in question.

On a previous job at a community college for an after the install wall upgrade, 
we used Firelite in the entry doors where we couldn’t get sprinklers to work, 
window sprinklers where we have glazing and “closely spaced” sprinklers as that 
was the Code language we were working with..



David Toshio Williams, PE, LEED-AP O+M
(218) 279-2436 direct | (218) 310-2446 cell
LHB, Inc. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN



From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Roland Huggins
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2016 10:38 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Wall Wetting per IBC - 2012, Chapter 31, 3104.5 Exception 1

look at NFPA 13:8.15.26 - Sprinkler Protected Glazing.  The wetting of the 
entire surface is rather important (in order to avoid failure of the glazing 
(barrier) from thermal shock.  It, I believe, originated in the Life Safety 
Code (which long ago allowed an exception using sprinklers with glass but 
limited to Atriums) with the said ENTIRE SURFACE specified.


Roland Huggins, PE - VP Engineering
American Fire Sprinkler Assn.       ---      Fire Sprinklers Saves Lives
Dallas, TX
http://www.firesprinkler.org<http://www.firesprinkler.org/>



On Nov 4, 2016, at 12:44 PM, David Williams 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

We have an newly constructed open parking garage with a surrounding skywalk. 
The building official is now asking for fire barriers complying with Chapter 31 
between the two and the owner and architect want to deal with this using the 
exception that uses fire protection sprinklers for equivalency. It appears to 
me that the Code is asking us to protect the parking garage from the skywalk as 
the Code says to install fire protection sprinklers on the “interior” of the 
wall (which is the garage side) that fully wet the wall as a compliance path. 
We already have a fully sprinklered structure, with a row of dry sprinklers 
eight feet and eight feet on center away on the garage side, but the published 
spray pattern for the Reliable F1FR56 upright installed by the contractor would 
leave the top 3 feet of the wall unwetted.

It appears to me I would have to install an additional row of heads right along 
the wall, but even then, it looks like the spray pattern shows drop off at any 
sort of reasonable spacing so some parts of the wall remain unwetted.  What 
have others done in this situation?

<image001.png><http://www.lhbcorp.com/who-we-are/our-history/>

David Toshio Williams, PE, FPE – Senior MEP/FP Engineer
21 West Superior Street, Suite 500, Duluth, MN 55802
Direct 218.279.2436 | Cell 218.310.2446
LHBcorp.com<http://www.lhbcorp.com/>

LHB, Inc. | PERFORMANCE DRIVEN DESIGN.




_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to