Don't think I would have a problem with it,
How old is the existing pipe?
Was it wet or dry?
Was it visually inspected?
Will it hold a hydro?
Common practice to re-use existing pipe.

Richard Carr, SET
Branch Manager
Cox Fire Protection, Inc
6555 Grace Lane.
Jacksonville, Fl. 32205
[email protected]
904-781-8227

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Matthew J Willis
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 1:35 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Salvaged Piping

I think you are fighting a losing battle. If the pipe meets the criteria in 
Chapter 6, and can hold the Hydro, then it is good to go. Contractors typically 
reuse pipe for drops and the like....

R/
Matt

Matthew J. Willis
Project Manager
Rapid Fire Protection Inc.<http://rapidfireinc.com/>
1530 Samco Road
Rapid City, SD 57702
Office-605.348.2342
Direct Line-605.593.5063
Cell-605.391.2733
Fax:-605.348.0108

[cid:[email protected]]

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Micah Davis, SET
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 11:33 AM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Salvaged Piping


Don't see anything in the standard or IFC that prohibits re-using demo'd pipe.  
Could you require that the contractor prove there is no MIC in the re-used 
pipe?  At least that would provide a level of assurance the pipe is sound.  
Also, might put enough pressure on the contractor to abandon the practice or 
possibly even undo some of the questionable work.


Micah Davis, SET
NICET #124745
Water Based Systems Layout, Level IV

Dynamic Fire Designs



Mail: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Mobile: 931-242-1299
www.dynamicfiredesigns.com<http://dynamicfiredesigns.com>


Dynamic Fire Designs * 13063 County Line Rd., Box #87 * Spring Hill * FL * 34609

This message is confidential. It may also be privileged or otherwise protected 
by work product immunity or other legal rules. If you have received it by 
mistake, please let us know by e-mail reply and delete it from your system; you 
may not copy this message or disclose its contents to anyone. The integrity and 
security of this message cannot be guaranteed on the Internet.


________________________________
From: Sprinklerforum 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
 on behalf of Reed A. Roisum, SET 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 12:00 PM
To: 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Salvaged Piping


I am doing CA on a project where the contractor was allowed to "reuse" existing 
piping to supply new sprinklers and drops in areas of renovation.  Apparently 
they demo'd sections of pipe and rehung to supply new sprinklers (it was 
obvious because the salvaged sections were painted and adjacent lengths were 
not:)).  In my mind I shouldn't have to do anything except say, "you can't do 
that!".  However, I've been asked to find references in our spec and/or the 
codes and standards that prohibits hanging demo'd pipe.



Our spec does say "Install pipes and pipe fittings in accordance with NFPA 
Standards."  Wondering if anyone knows of any language in NFPA 13 or elsewhere 
that would bolster my argument beyond saying that it is "commonly understood" 
or "standard practice"?



My view is that we gave permission to utilize existing piping; once they 
removed it, the pipe became demolished piping, not existing.  Unfortunately we 
are using the owner's spec and not ours so there is more opportunity for 
shenanigans :).



Thank you.



Reed Roisum





Reed A. Roisum, SET | Karges-Faulconbridge, Inc. | Senior Fire Protection 
Designer | Fargo, ND | direct: 701.552.9903 | mobile: 701.388.1352 | 
KFIengineers.com<http://www.kfiengineers.com>

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to