I have to admit in embarrassment that I had not looked at the annex information in A.9.1.1.8. You were entirely correct, Ryan, it does identify that the sprinkler piping itself can be used to support other sprinkler piping if the five criteria in 9.1.1.2 are followed. Those include:

1. Support 5x weight of water filled pipe + 250#
2. Point of support adequate to support the system
3. Spacing cannot exceed limits of 9.2.2.1(a) or (b).
4. Hanger materials shall be ferrous
5. Detailed calculations must be submitted when required by AHJ showing
   stresses developed and safety factors involved.

What has always held me back from starting down this path is items 1, 2, and 5. I don't know if the 5x+250 rule includes both the upper and lower sprinkler piping, of if the point of support evaluation is for a load applied on sprinkler piping or the building structure for the combined loads, and I don't have enough structural engineering understanding to even attempt to develop calculations to show the stresses and safety factors.

For me it's always been less expensive to use a trapeze than to hire a structural engineer to provide the calculations.
sincerely,*
Ken Wagoner, SET***
Parsley Consulting****
350 West 9th Avenue, Suite 206*****
Escondido, California 92025*******
Phone 760-745-6181*******
Visit our website <http://www.parsleyconsulting.com/> ***


_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to