Two different heads both have similar RTI. I’d just ask for simple graphic with 
the two design calc plate.

Best.

Bruce Verhei 

> On Jan 25, 2018, at 11:54, John Paulsen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Guys:
>  
> I have been pouring over 13 all afternoon and I can’t find the requirement 
> for the scenario I am dealing with, so I humbly ask for your help.
>  
>                 Hazard: Diesel Engine Mfg plant                 – Loading 
> dock area
> -          30’ Deck, 20’ Mics Rack Storage, Grp A Plastic containers with 
> metal parts.
>  
>                 Existing System(s)                           8”x2.5”X8” Grid 
>                                                                               
>   K 8.0 Uprights
> .60 GPM/4,000 sq. ft.
>  
> The insurance carrier has done a loss prevention survey and their written 
> report says they will accept the omission of in rack sprinklers if the 
> overhead system will support K-16.8 heads and a design density of
> .80 GPM/2,000 sq. ft. under section 17.2.1.2.1 (e)  (which it will with a 
> large safety factor)
>  
> My question is this:         What restrictions do I have with the overhead 
> sprinklers and mixing the sprinkler K factors?
> Do all of the heads on the system need to be changed to K16.8 or just the 
> ones within 40’ of the racks?   
>                                                 If I can mix K factors, do I 
> need a 2’ draft curtain in between like I would if it were ESFR?
>                
>  
> Thanks,
>  
> John Paulsen – SET
> Crown Fire System Design
> 6282 Seeds Rd.
> Grove City, OH 43123
> P – 614-782-2438
> F – 614-782-2374
> C – 614-348-8206
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to