NFPA 88A 2015 edition: 9.2.4.1 – 

 



 

Very helpful …

 

John Irwin

 

From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Travis Mack
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:47 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Robotic Parking

 

You are going to have to get the EOR that created your “engineered” drawing 
involved to give you a hazard since it doesn’t seem to be addressed in NFPA 13. 

 

You may want to try to contact the company that designed the robotic car system 
and see if they can give any guidance. 

 

I bet your EOR has a comment to design to NFPA 13 and figures he is off the 
hook. Just kick it back to them. 

 

It’s Friday. Make it his weekend project to do his job of giving the proper 
criteria. I bet that goes over well. 

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

"Follow" us on Facebook:  
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692> 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to MFP Design via:

https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 13, 2018, at 8:40 AM, John Irwin <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

This is 7 levels of cars stacked vertically. We are in the 2013 edition of NFPA 
13.

 

 

 

John Irwin, C.E.T. –  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]

Commercial Fire and Communications

Fire Sprinkler Specialist – NICET ID: 134153

Cell: 727-282-9243

 

From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > On Behalf Of Travis 
Mack
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 11:38 AM
To: [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
Subject: Re: Robotic Parking

 

If this is the “car stackers” mentioned in 2016 edition, then it is only for 2 
levels high. 

Travis Mack, SET

MFP Design, LLC

"Follow" us on Facebook:  
<https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692> 
https://www.facebook.com/pages/MFP-Design-LLC/92218417692

Send large files to MFP Design via:

https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign

 

Sent from my iPhone


On Jul 13, 2018, at 8:35 AM, Nick Maneen <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

2016 Edition of 13 calls these Extra Hazard. These are a challenge to say the 
least. Good luck. I wish I had a better answer for you.

Nick Maneen
704-791-7789

 

On Fri, Jul 13, 2018, 11:33 AM John Irwin <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Anyone have any experience with these new robotic parking buildings? My 
“engineered” plans are pretty bad. No hazard is given. I am going to assume the 
same as a parking garage? I don’t see this as being too challenging, but I am 
wondering if there is some huge pitfall that I am not aware of. It’s pretty 
much 7 floors of this ….

 

<image001.png>

 

The top floor doesn’t show the center area protected. I’m wondering if it needs 
to be … 

 

John Irwin

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> 
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to