Some AHJ's have misinterpreted the tables in Chapter 10 of NFPA 13, because the 
different standards listed give sizes of 4" - ___

Spencer Tomlinson
Principal, PE

[red logo]
Ph:  316-202-6412
Fax: 316-202-2346
Cell: 620-955-7293
www.tomlinsonfire.com<http://www.tomlinsonfire.com/>

From: Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G <tm...@mfpdesign.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 12:59 PM
To: Spencer Tomlinson <spen...@tomlinsonfire.com>; 'Steve Leyton' 
<st...@protectiondesign.com>; sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Subject: RE: Minimum Lead-in Sizing

Where is he even reading a 4" minimum? I don't see that in NFPA 24 at all.  6" 
min if serving hydrants.  If serving sprinkler system, then must just calc to 
prove.

[MFP_logo_F]<http://www.mfpdesign.com/>
Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET
MFP Design, LLC
3356 E Vallejo Ct
Gilbert, AZ 85298
NEW EXTENSION: 480-505-9271 ext. 700
fax: 866-430-6107
tm...@mfpdesign.com<mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com>
www.mfpdesign.com<http://www.mfpdesign.com>

Send large files to us via: 
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0>
LinkedIn: 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0>

"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten."


From: Spencer Tomlinson 
<spen...@tomlinsonfire.com<mailto:spen...@tomlinsonfire.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 10:53 AM
To: Steve Leyton 
<st...@protectiondesign.com<mailto:st...@protectiondesign.com>>; 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G 
<tm...@mfpdesign.com<mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com>>
Subject: RE: Minimum Lead-in Sizing

Yes sir - of the exact same opinion, as well as Matt's "what does it matter"-  
since it will calc without issue.  It's never been my opinion that a minimum 4" 
is required anyway, since it's not explicitly stated, and the only limitation 
on pipe sizing being explicitly stated in Chapter 23.  Was hoping maybe one of 
the tech committee folks out there may share an experience that a 4" minimum is 
not the intent, and it's just AHJ misinterpretation by looking at 
ductile/cement lined/plastic pipe tables in Chapter 10.  I've got what I need 
in the agreements from those that responded - thanks as always!

Spencer Tomlinson
Principal, PE

[red logo]
Ph:  316-202-6412
Fax: 316-202-2346
Cell: 620-955-7293
www.tomlinsonfire.com<http://www.tomlinsonfire.com/>

From: Steve Leyton 
<st...@protectiondesign.com<mailto:st...@protectiondesign.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 12:35 PM
To: 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G 
<tm...@mfpdesign.com<mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com>>; Spencer Tomlinson 
<spen...@tomlinsonfire.com<mailto:spen...@tomlinsonfire.com>>
Subject: RE: Minimum Lead-in Sizing

What TMack said.   "Please show me in the standard or code where that provision 
resides."  Then show them the new listed in-building riser sweeps from Ames 
that go down to 2".

SL

From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org] On 
Behalf Of Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 10:32 AM
To: 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G 
<tm...@mfpdesign.com<mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com>>; 'Spencer Tomlinson' 
<spen...@tomlinsonfire.com<mailto:spen...@tomlinsonfire.com>>
Subject: RE: Minimum Lead-in Sizing

What is the reference for a minimum 4"?  We've had several smaller than that 
over my career.  Never had an issue that I know of.

[MFP_logo_F]<http://www.mfpdesign.com/>
Travis Mack, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G, SET
MFP Design, LLC
3356 E Vallejo Ct
Gilbert, AZ 85298
NEW EXTENSION: 480-505-9271 ext. 700
fax: 866-430-6107
tm...@mfpdesign.com<mailto:tm...@mfpdesign.com>
www.mfpdesign.com<http://www.mfpdesign.com>

Send large files to us via: 
https://www.hightail.com/u/MFPDesign<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hightail.com%2Fu%2FMFPDesign&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=eGdMZGu2wXhUupGwgGTrqF3b54OP5%2BAZvlHhABSexWY%3D&reserved=0>
LinkedIn: 
https://www.linkedin.com/in/travismack<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Ftravismack&data=02%7C01%7C%7C1121d49f9e6b4cf248f108d4df580e77%7C14e5497c16da42e69ffa77d19bafe511%7C0%7C0%7C636379016677342180&sdata=tT5E7LsZjSmyreKi4gDCa70EWN%2BZodi%2FhbeCbHNRijI%3D&reserved=0>

"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price 
is forgotten."


From: Sprinklerforum 
<sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org>>
 On Behalf Of Spencer Tomlinson via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 10:30 AM
To: 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org<mailto:sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org>
Cc: Spencer Tomlinson 
<spen...@tomlinsonfire.com<mailto:spen...@tomlinsonfire.com>>
Subject: Minimum Lead-in Sizing

Hi all - I've got a customer that's in a pinch and I'm trying to help them out. 
 They have a 2" lead in supplying an existing building, mixed use 
commercial/residential.  NFPA 13 protection on 2 floors.  The 2" will actually 
calculate as it sits.  My question for those that have run into the "minimum 
pipe size is 4" requirement from an AHJ before, on a 13 system, what argument 
have you used to contradict the statement?

The ASTM standards listed in the underground piping tables of 13 for brass, 
copper, and stainless piping all include/cover pipe sizes smaller than 4".  
Section 23.4.1.3 (2016 edition) states that pipe sizing shall only be limited 
by available water supply.

Any other good arguments out there?

Spencer Tomlinson
Principal, PE

[red logo]
Ph:  316-202-6412
Fax: 316-202-2346
Cell: 620-955-7293
www.tomlinsonfire.com<http://www.tomlinsonfire.com/>

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
        • RE: M... Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G via Sprinklerforum
          • R... Bruce Verhei via Sprinklerforum
    • RE: Minimum L... Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum
      • RE: Minim... Spencer Tomlinson via Sprinklerforum
        • RE: M... Travis Mack, SET, CFPS, CWBSP, RME-G via Sprinklerforum
          • R... Skyler Bilbo via Sprinklerforum
            • ... Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
              • ... John Denhardt via Sprinklerforum
              • ... Steve Leyton via Sprinklerforum
          • R... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
          • R... Spencer Tomlinson via Sprinklerforum
            • ... Anthony via Sprinklerforum
              • ... Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
    • RE: Minimum L... Matt Grise via Sprinklerforum
  • Re: Minimum Lead-i... Parsley Consulting via Sprinklerforum
  • Obstructed Constru... Tony Silva via Sprinklerforum

Reply via email to