Ideally supply hose stations from both systems but that would be
interconnections and check valves......

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 12:05 PM Kevin Hall via Sprinklerforum <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I would take the connection from either system. I don't see a need to run a
> whole new supply to one hose valve. Just make sure the inside hose is
> accounted for in the hydraulic calculations.
>
> Kevin Hall, P.E., MSFPE
> *Coordinator, Engineering and Technical Services*
>
> *American Fire Sprinkler Association*
> p: 214-349-5971
> w: firesprinkler.org
> <https://www.facebook.com/firesprinkler.org/>
> <https://twitter.com/afsa/status/1039528345367732224>
> <
> https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-fire-sprinkler-association-afsa-/
> >
>    <https://www.instagram.com/firesprinklerorg/>
>
>
> *AFSA Summer Sale!*
>
> For a limited time only, AFSA is offering members up to 50% off its
> on-demand recorded webinars! Featuring the most sought-after thought
> leaders, AFSA On-Demand offers a superior learning experience with ability
> to earn CEU and CPD credits anytime, anywhere. Visit
> http://www.firesprinkler.org/ondemand to learn more.
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 4:54 PM Tony Silva via Sprinklerforum <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > In a storage occupancy that requires small hose stations complying with
> > NFPA 13, an acceptable method of connection is to supply from an
> "Adjacent
> > Sprinkler System". Some hose stations fall right in the boundary between
> > two zones. The contractor wants to supply these hose stations from either
> > one of these adjacent zones. I am of the opinion that these hose stations
> > should be supplied from a zone that is not serviced by these hose
> stations,
> > requiring longer supply piping.
> >
> > Any thoughts? What is your position on this issue?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Tony
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sprinklerforum mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> >
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to