Just remember to allow for thermal expansion and contraction. It can get very 
ugly if the CPVC is restrained and thermal expansion and contraction has not 
been appropriately allowed for. This applies when a building is warm in the 
summer during construction and then air conditioning is turned on as well as 
heating and cold weather changes.

Scott
 
Office: (763) 425-1001 x 2
Cell: (612) 759-5556

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> On Behalf 
Of Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 2:36 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: Bob Knight <b...@firebyknight.com>
Subject: RE: CPVC EQ Bracing - 2 hole straps and another question

Personally, I would provide the restraint and be done.  As Travis said, apply 
the less than 6" criteria and you should be good with the CPVC hangers.

9.3.5.8.5   Four-way bracing shall not be required where risers penetrate
intermediate floors in multistory buildings where the clearance does not exceed 
the limits of 9.3.4.

Thank you,

Bob Knight, CET III
Fire by Knight, LLC
208-318-3057


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
On Behalf Of J H via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 1:24 PM
To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
Cc: J H
Subject: Re: CPVC EQ Bracing - 2 hole straps and another question

So the sidewall sprinklers for the upper floor of this project are being fed 
from the system below due to freezing concerns at the upper level. Of course 
the line will be strapped to the wall framing on it's way up and so according 
to the definitions if I'm supplying a single sprinkler it would be a 'sprig' 
and just require a two-hole strap on the way up (restraint) while a couple of 
spots on the project will feed two sprinklers from one tap off the lower floor 
- I'm guessing that in the case of more than two sprinklers it's no longer a 
'sprig' and would be a riser and would require a 4-way brace. Sound about right?


<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 1:04 PM Bob Knight via Sprinklerforum < 
sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org> wrote:

> Sprigs do not require sway bracing, but there is this: 9.3.6.6  Sprigs  
> 4 ft  or  longer  shall  be  restrained against lateral movement.
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Bob Knight, CET III
> Fire by Knight, LLC
> 208-318-3057
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum [mailto:
> sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org]
> On Behalf Of Matthew J Willis via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:28 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Cc: Matthew J Willis
> Subject: RE: CPVC EQ Bracing - 2 hole straps and another question
>
> To my knowledge, the 2 hole strap is listed as a hanger only. Not for 
> seismic.
>
> The second question is a good one.
> I love Chapter 3, especially for seismic.
>
> Check 3.5.11 in the 2016 for a "Sprig".
>
> The standard mandates riser for 4 way if they exceed 3'-0".
>
> Riser Nipples, the piece between a Cross Main and Branchline, 3.5.9, 
> are excluded.
>
> 3.5.10 is for "Risers".
>
> Given that the definition of a sprig, seems different than Riser, you 
> may have a point.
>
> But Riser is pretty broad.
>
> R/
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sprinklerforum <sprinklerforum-boun...@lists.firesprinkler.org> 
> On Behalf Of J H via Sprinklerforum
> Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 12:13 PM
> To: sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
> Cc: J H <design.azfire...@gmail.com>
> Subject: CPVC EQ Bracing - 2 hole straps and another question
>
> Hello,
> I thought that two hole straps used to secure CPVC acted as seismic 
> bracing?
> I don't know where I've heard that and couldn't find anything in the 
> standard. Is this correct?
>
> Also, if you have a 1"x8'-6" riser to a single horizontal sidewall 
> sprinkler would that technically be an 'armover' and not require 
> seismic or would that fall under being a riser requiring seismic 
> bracing?
>
> Thanks,
> JH
>
> <
>
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
> gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon
>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
> >
> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <
>
https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
> gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link
>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
> >
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
>
>
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
>

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campai
gn=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=link>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
Sprinklerforum@lists.firesprinkler.org
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to