Prior to 2022, it could not.  The 2022 edition includes new language waving the 
minimum area and spacing requirements, specifically:

14.2.4.3
In buildings with obstructed construction where ESFR sprinklers are installed 
in accordance with 14.2.4.1 and the sprinklers are located entirely above the 
bottom plane of the adjacent solid structural members (beams, stem, and so 
forth), the requirements for minimum sprinkler spacing per 14.2.9.4 shall apply 
within each channel formed by the solid structural members, but the 
requirements for minimum sprinkler area spacing per 14.2.8.3 and minimum 
sprinkler linear spacing per 14.2.9.4 for sprinklers between channels formed by 
the solid structural members shall not apply.

Similar exemptions were added for solid structural members in otherwise 
unobstructed construction.

I don't see nor am I aware of any requirement to change the calculation number 
of sprinklers or discharge based on using these exemptions.

Mike Morey
CFPS 3229 • NICET S.E.T. 123677
Project Manager • Fire Protection Group
Shambaugh & Son, LP an EMCOR Company
7614 Opportunity Drive • Fort Wayne, IN • 46825
direct 260.487.7824 /  cell 260.417.0625 /  fax 260.487.7991
email [email protected]



-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 2:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Kyle.Montgomery <[email protected]>; Mike Hairfield <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: ESFR - Minimum Remote Area Size

 
BE ADVISED - This email originated outside EMCOR. 
 

Deflector distance isn't a problem, I can either run the branch line up high in 
every pocket/bay or utilize an upright ESFR (Tyco ESFR-17).

I was thinking that the minimum spacing didn't apply when there was an 
obstruction/baffle between the heads (in this case, the legs of the concrete 
tee) and the heads are installed in "every bay channel formed by solid 
structural members". This is specifically allowed in the FM Datasheets, but I 
believe they also have a minimum remote areas size that would require you to 
add sprinklers to the remote area. 

Is the consensus among the group that this building (concrete tees with legs 5 
feet on center) just cannot be protected with ESFR sprinklers per NFPA 13?

And, if that's the case, are we also saying that any time there is a 
beam/obstruction in an ESFR system that the heads on either side of it still 
need to be at least 8 feet apart? You can't have a head 3 feet away on each 
side of the beam (heads 6 feet apart but with a solid obstruction/baffle 
between them)?

-Kyle M

-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Mike Hairfield via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2021 12:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Mike Hairfield <[email protected]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: ESFR - Minimum Remote Area Size

I don’t believe ESFR sprinklers can be installed in a concrete tee building.
Minimum spacing is 8’-0” and what is the deflector distance.
Mike 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 29, 2021, at 2:11 PM, Kyle.Montgomery via Sprinklerforum 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm dealing with an existing concrete tee building that the owner wants to 
> retrofit with an ESFR system. Heads will be closely spaced due to the 
> obstruction caused by the tees; 5-foot on center. Does NFPA 13 have a minimum 
> remote area size, or is it just 12 heads?
> 
> -Kyle M
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http*3A*2F*2Flists.firesprinkler.org*2Flistinfo.cgi*2Fsprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org&amp;data=04*7C01*7C*7C2243e8f422f447e9e98808d9caff0ba5*7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa*7C1*7C0*7C637764019046194532*7CUnknown*7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0*3D*7C3000&amp;sdata=pbf*2BoThaf77nppLZONRpZrs9AwSkwAHo*2FPdId21LXD8*3D&amp;reserved=0__;JSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJSUlJQ!!Ba8_KKAT!cFpuCO_w9YY4Ug5JApVoeXhH0dAjA9mRe1AyvYgW_8Szjt_tnI_096ZtrSXQJ6oSgXY$
>  
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!Ba8_KKAT!cFpuCO_w9YY4Ug5JApVoeXhH0dAjA9mRe1AyvYgW_8Szjt_tnI_096ZtrSXQNV76eoU$
 
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org__;!!FaxH778!OAZ2uDG6FRNTejJG47Oec-yUCo_GPfqfNob9JCu-EM3hgrkMqn_dATAtn_6-YupA$
 

This message is for the named person's use only.  It may contain confidential, 
proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege 
is waived or lost by any mistransmission.  If you receive this message in 
error, please  immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, 
destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender.  You must not, directly or 
indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message 
if you are not the intended recipient.
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to