I agree with Bob's proposed change and FWIW, the state of Minnesota agrees...

2020 MN Building Code
903.3.1.6.3 Swimming pools. Sprinkler protection need not be provided on the 
ceiling of rooms containing swimming pools when the pool area is used 
exclusively for swimming purposes and when sprinklers are provided around the 
perimeter of the pool area.


Reed A. Roisum, SET | KFI Engineers | Fire Protection Project Manager | Fargo, 
ND | direct: 701.552.9903 | mobile: 701.388.1352 | KFIengineers.com 
<www.kfiengineers.com>
-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Bob Caputo via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Monday, February 7, 2022 6:48 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Bob Caputo <[email protected]>; Tony Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: swimming pool

For what its worth, in the 2013 code cycle of NFPA 13, I submitted two proposed 
changes related to this topic.  The first was to eliminate sprinklers directly 
above the water where indoor swimming pools were present.  This was rejected by 
the committee with the statement that indoor pools are not always in service 
and when drained, could be used for storage - so sprinklers are required above 
the pool.

The second proposal was to eliminate sprinklers in gymnasium locker room shower 
areas where non-combustible tiles covered the entire floor, walls and ceilings. 
This was also rejected by the committee with the statement that gym mats and 
similar combustibles could be stored in these areas.

Additional discussion related to swimming pools expressed concerns for 
combustible play toys and equipment often found in swimming pools.  Yes, I did 
argue that changes of occupancy or use are addressed by NFPA 25 and addressed 
the corrosive nature of the environment on the sprinklers, but the committee 
rejected the proposal to omit sprinklers above the indoor pool.


Bob Caputo, CFPS
President
American Fire Sprinkler Association

Expand your business with ITM.
Professionalize the role of your inspection team with AFSA’s comprehensive 
20-month ITM Inspector Development program that provides a blended learning 
environment teamed with robust curriculum created by top industry leaders.
Now enrolling for Spring 2022!


-----Original Message-----
From: Sprinklerforum <[email protected]> On Behalf 
Of Tony Silva via Sprinklerforum
Sent: Sunday, February 6, 2022 10:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Tony Silva <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: swimming pool

Thanks for the responses. I'm trying to find out the industry practice.
Which do you see more? Sprinklers below the water slides or none taking into 
account the fire load and possible vandalism?
Tony

On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 5:31 PM AKS-Gmail-IMAP via Sprinklerforum < 
[email protected]> wrote:

> That is the preferred way to set the AHJ agreement, in distributed 
> meeting minutes of course, because the other way it may be set, 
> “provide NFPA 13 coverage for the deck area only”, means some 
> sprinklers have to be installed beyond the pool edge to satisfy the 
> application density transition boundary rules. That’s why it is best 
> to be present at that first AHJ meeting, not just the Architect like 
> some Architects like to do.
> The AHJs appreciate being in on the design from inception when dealing 
> with odd situations.
>
> >
> > I have seen a pool where it was the AHJ that specifically required 
> > NO
> heads anywhere over a pool because they are impossible to maintain.
> (municipal facility)
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Sprinklerforum mailing list
> [email protected]
>
> http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkl
> er.org
>
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org
_______________________________________________
Sprinklerforum mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.firesprinkler.org/listinfo.cgi/sprinklerforum-firesprinkler.org

Reply via email to