sprinklernotes
Decorative Roof Features


You have asked the following question: “We have a project where several small 
structures are built on top of the roof. These structures are completely 
separated from the main building and sit on a finished roof. The small 
structures are made with combustible materials and are uninsulated. There are 
no penetrations into the main building from these structures. The project team 
is calling the small structures dormers or decorative elements. We believe this 
does not qualify as a decorative element as it is part of the roof structure 
and it exceeds 160 cubic feet. We believe sprinkler protection would be 
required in these structures. Could these structures be considered a decorative 
element? Could sprinklers be omitted in these spaces? In response to your 
question, we have reviewed NFPA 13, 2016 edition as the applicable standard. 
Our informal interpretation is sprinkler protection is required.

In this situation, Section 8.15.1.2.18.1 has to be reviewed and it states:

Sprinklers shall be permitted to be omitted from within combustible soffits, 
eaves, overhangs, and decorative frame elements that are constructed in 
accordance with 8.15.1.2.18.2 through 8.15.1.2.18.5.

Since Section 8.15.1.2.18.1 states “8.15.1.2.18.2 through 8.15.1.2.18.5” all 
four conditions listed have to be met. With the small structures being on top 
of the roof structure Section 8.15.1.2.18.2 does not apply because the 4 ft. 
maximum width in Section 8.15.1.2.18.2 is directed at limiting the impact of 
combustibles beneath overhang type features. With that being said, this 
allowance is not limited to just features on the exterior wall such as 
overhangs. It also applies to features on the roof, as indicated by Section 
8.15.1.2.18.4 dictating separation by walls or roofs of noncombustible 
construction. Next, Section 8.15.1.2.18.3 is requiring these spaces to be less 
than 160 cu. ft., which they are not. Since the structures do not meet Section 
8.15.1.2.18.3, this alone removes the possibility of applying Section 
8.15.1.2.18.1 to omit sprinkler protection. Continuing on to Section 
8.15.1.2.18.4, the structures are required to be separated from the main 
building interior by walls or roofs of noncombustible or limited-combustible 
construction. To be considered noncombustible or limited-combustible the 
structural members have to be noncombustible not just the exposed finish 
material. If the structural members are combustible, Section 8.15.1.2.18.4 also 
removes the possibility of applying Section 8.15.1.2.18.1 (to omit sprinkler 
protection). Finally, Section 8.15.1.2.18.5 requires no openings or unprotected 
penetrations directly into the building, which there are none. As stated, all 
of the conditions listed in Section 8.15.1.2.18.1 to omit sprinkler protection 
must be satisfied and two of the four are not met in this situation. Thus, 
sprinkler protection is required in the structures. With that being said, there 
are other ways to omit sprinklers in these spaces per NFPA 13 if sprinkler 
protection is undesirable due to possible freezing and maintenance issues. The 
most commonly used section to omit sprinkler protection from a combustible 
concealed space would be Section 8.15.1.2.7, which requires the space to be 
filled entirely with noncombustible insulation. There are other conditions in 
Section 8.15.1.2 that could be used as well in this situation to omit sprinkler 
protection, Section 8.15.1.2.7 is more commonly used.

Reply via email to