On 3 sep, 16:13, Jed Ludlow <[email protected]> wrote: > > My preference is for a shell to make development easier, not as a > > front end to every scientific tool that doesn't have a GUI. > > +1 > > It seems like there is less magic going on in Spyder 2 as compared to > Spyder 1.1, and I'm all for that. I like the model of a simple IDE for > IPython and the standard Python shell with a few conveniences to keep > code organized. I would hate to see it expand until it fulfills > Zawinski's Law of Software Envelopment: "Every program attempts to > expand until it can read mail. Those programs which cannot so expand > are replaced by ones which can."
I completely agree and I'm quite pleased to read your point of view on Spyder v2.0. Now Spyder v2.0 has 98% of its target features so I'm going to concentrate only on bug fixes. I'll try and keep working on its stability rather than on adding new features (of course there will be *minor* new features as well). Pierre -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
