On Jul 6, 5:23 pm, Santiago Jaramillo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > I agree with Dave that adding line-level timings would be very > valuable. > I was involved in the development of the current version of the > profiler, and the decision to use python's profiler (which I find > limiting, as it does not do line-profiling) was mostly to avoid > dependencies on third-party packages. > I've played a little with Robert Kern's line profiler and it seems to > do what we need. We just need to figure out a few things about the > integration with Spyder. > > You should open an issue on the tracker (with Pierre's approval) and > we can start discussing how to implement the next version of the > profiler. > Best, > -- > Santiago
I completely agree. -Pierre -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
