I've opened Issue #705 for this. Not sure if I did it correctly though... http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=705
-Dave On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Pierre Raybaut <[email protected]>wrote: > On Jul 6, 5:23 pm, Santiago Jaramillo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I agree with Dave that adding line-level timings would be very > > valuable. > > I was involved in the development of the current version of the > > profiler, and the decision to use python's profiler (which I find > > limiting, as it does not do line-profiling) was mostly to avoid > > dependencies on third-party packages. > > I've played a little with Robert Kern's line profiler and it seems to > > do what we need. We just need to figure out a few things about the > > integration with Spyder. > > > > You should open an issue on the tracker (with Pierre's approval) and > > we can start discussing how to implement the next version of the > > profiler. > > Best, > > -- > > Santiago > > I completely agree. > > -Pierre > > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en.
