On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:09 AM, Aeronaelius <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear Jed, > > Yes that is indeed true. However I also like the option to be able to > interact with the interpreter after the script has finished. This way I can > still access all variables. In that case the timer keeps on running. > > Kind regards, > > Aeronaelius > Today, Spyder simply monitors the time since each interpreter was born, and I can't honestly think of any sane way that we could modify that behavior so that it reliably predicts the particular portion of the input commands it is supposed to time. I would suggest inserting repeated calls to time.time() into your script and then take the difference. http://docs.python.org/2/library/time.html#time.time -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
