Well,

yes, you can always install new Python versions from source.

But it becomes difficult as soon as try to install e.g. ipython.
I was not able to make ipython use Python 3.3, it was only
working with Python 3.2.

So, yes, it is possible, but it can become very messy.

Regards:

Uwe

On 04.07.2013 13:21, Tel Kit wrote:
Correction, Python 3.3 is available in Ubuntu 12.04 (and any other Linux version for that matter), it's just not available through apt-get.

On Saturday, June 29, 2013 8:22:31 PM UTC+1, ufechner wrote:

    Hello,

    I just checked an Ubuntu 12.04 there is only Python 3.2.3 available.
    This could be a reason to support it until the next Ubuntu LTS
    version
    is released, which is planned for 04-2014.

    Best regards:

    Uwe Fechner

    Am 06/29/2013 06:52 PM, schrieb Jed Ludlow:
    > If you have interest in Python 3 support for Spyder, please read
    below and provide your thoughts.
    >
    > The primary goal for Spyder 2.3 is to provide support for Python
    2 and Python 3 from a single code
    > base. We are gradually working our way through the remaining
    bugs, but there are still a few
    > remaining outstanding issues. We'd like your opinions on one of
    them.
    >
    > As you may be aware, in Python 3 the distinction between text
    literals as either str or unicode is
    > no more, and all text literals are stored as unicode. From
    Python 3.0 to Python 3.2, the syntax
    > for declaring unicode literals (like u"foo") was removed from
    the language, so any use of the u
    > prefix is a syntax error in those versions. For Python 3.3 the
    language designers decided to allow
    > this syntax again since it makes supporting 2 and 3 from the
    same code base much simpler.
    > Basically, in Python 3.3, you are allowed to declare either
    "foo" or u"foo", and both will be
    > stored as Python-3-style text literals.
    >
    > How does this all relate to Spyder? We have developed a general
    solution for text literals that we
    > can use to support all Python 3 versions if we need to use it,
    but it creates a little but of
    > clutter in the code. It's certainly makes the code a bit cleaner
    if we support only Python 3.3.
    > So, in that light, we'd be very interested in knowing how may of
    you require support for Python
    > 3.0 through 3.2. Again, we are prepared to put in place a
    solution that will support all of Python
    > 3 if there is demand for these earlier versions, but we didn't
    want to add the complexity to the
    > code if there simply wasn't any demand for it.
    >
    > On behalf of the Spyder team, cheers,
    >
    > Jed
    >
    >
    > --
    > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
    Google Groups "spyder" group.
    > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
    it, send an email to
    > [email protected] <javascript:>.
    > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
    <javascript:>.
    > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib
    <http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib>.
    > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out
    <https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out>.
    >
    >

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"spyder" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to