On Thursday, September 25, 2014 10:16:34 PM UTC+2, Joseph Martinot-Lagarde wrote: > > Converting the repo is easy, there is a well tested program for this (I > don't remember the name but I already used it). I think that the more > complicated part would be to convert the issues. >
Maybe you mean the one provided by github ? https://porter.github.com/new > > Le 25/09/2014 18:14, Gonzalo A. PEÑA CASTELLANOS a écrit : > > > > The case on having most of scientific packages hosted in Github is quite > > strong on a reason for moving to Github. > > > > I personally like the idea of using a python Version control system for > > doing version control... but if the idea is to move to github then > > perhaps it would be better to move the whole repo to git, now for this I > > am not sure if it is something that can be easily done... > > > > > > On Thursday, September 25, 2014 12:29:18 PM UTC+2, Adrian Klaver wrote: > > > > On 09/24/2014 02:36 AM, Joseph Martinot-Lagarde wrote: > > > Le dimanche 21 septembre 2014 16:04:51 UTC+2, Adrian Klaver a > > écrit : > > > > > > On 09/20/2014 09:22 PM, Ioannis Filippidis wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I would like to ask about thoughts and opinions regarding > > moving the > > > > development of Spyder to github, using git. > > > > > > Stay on bitbucket. > > > > > > Why ? Can you develop your point ? > > > > The main reason is I find Mercurial a lot easier to use. The > secondary > > reason is I find the whole history rewriting thing in Git > unsettling. > > That being said, I did some research on GitHub vs BitBucket and it > was > > not inspiring for BitBucket. In general BitBucket seems to be > falling > > behind and in particular with regards to Mercurial support. So at > this > > point I would say I can live with BitBucket, but would not oppose a > > move > > to GitHub. Might have to explore Hg-Git(hg-git.github.io/ > > <http://hg-git.github.io/>) though. > > > > > > > > > > I'm personally in favor of moving to git because I'm more used to > > it and > > > I find the branching mechanism simpler. > > > > > > I think that the most important point regarding github is > thatmost > > > (all?) python scientific projects are on github. Spyder would > > gain a lot > > > more dynamism than what we have on bitbucket (even if it's > already > > > better than googlecode). > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Adrian Klaver > > [email protected] <javascript:> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "spyder" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > > an email to > > [email protected] <javascript:> > > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>. > > To post to this group, send email to > > [email protected] <javascript:> > > <mailto:[email protected] <javascript:>>. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "spyder" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/spyderlib. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
