Please remember that we are using Perl script to generate the HTML pages, then 
I ask you:

What is the problem to put and "if" statement and let choose the user if (s)he 
wants to use JavaScript (and DHTML) or not?

I dont know why all the people who is using GUI cannot have a better menu just 
because some people still use console access?

I think this is not fair and the solution for both plataform is not very 
dificult to generate and maintain!

We are programmers, we know how to separate the content of the menu from the 
presentation. Dieter already did a nice work about that. Please check the 
file "menu.ini" if you still dont understand that.

That is all I said from the begining, please check the olds mails. Is this 
still not clear?

Regards,

Antonio Gallardo.

El Lunes, 26 de Agosto de 2002 18:29, Steven D'Aprano escribi�:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 02:30:59PM -0400, Keith Mastin wrote:
> > >It could be argued that getting a better UI is worth the cost of losing
> > >console access. That is a legitimate tradeoff, and its worth exploring
> > >whether it is a tradeoff that Dieter wants to make.
> >
> > There are a lot of programs out there that have already done this...
> > console accessibility is one of the major features that made sql-ledger
> > so attractive to me.
>
> [snip]
>
> That's fine. I'm not personally arguing either way, I'm just suggesting
> that there is an argument to be made.
>
> I realise its a lot of work, but it is possible to have two interfaces. In
> fact, since sql-ledger is open source, if any javascript wizards out their
> feel like building a new UI over the top of Dieter's engine, that might be
> a workable solution.


-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone?  Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390
-------------------------------------------------------
(un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to