There's quite a bit of useful information here about
JavaScript compatibility across different browsers, and
ways to deal with the differences:

  http://www.xs4all.nl/~ppk/js/

The main lessons to be learned here are that:

(1) Most of the good things that can be done with JS *can*
    work properly with a variety of popular browsers, and

(2) So-called "browser detection" is almost always a very
    bad idea.

Cheers,

-- Rod
   http://www.sunsetsystems.com/

On Tuesday 27 August 2002 08:04 am, Antonio Gallardo Rivera wrote:
> I agree with you Dieter, but dont agree to use closed Microsoft specific
> extension to JavaScript. I think this is why many people dont like
> JavaScript, because there are many sites that always tell us:
>
> "You dont have MS IE installed Please download the it!".
>
> But this is not a valid reason to tell that JavaScript is not fair.
> Javascript is just a language to embed into HTML nothing more. But if you
> got into the close web of Microsoft in around JavaScript, then we will
> lose.
>
> I never hear someone telling that C or C++ even Java is not a good language
> just becaused they are closed to MS. This is ridiculous! But you will got
> into the MS tramp if you use the libraries (or sometimes called
> "extensions) of the specific language.
>
> There are many JavaScript libraries that works fine in Netscape or Mozilla
> compatible browsers. That means that are not tied to a specific browers or
> company.
>
> I hope you can got my point about that.
>
> Regards,
>
> Antonio Gallardo.
>
> El Martes, 27 de Agosto de 2002 07:38, Dieter Simader escribi�:
> > Frontends for the browser are split up. At the moment there are two
> > directories which run code depending on which browser you use.
> >
> > bin/mozilla  runs the framed version, run of the mill straight html
> > bin/lynx     is for the lynx browser
> >              most everything is linked to bin/mozilla except the menu
> >              is different
> >
> > bin/js       is intended for Javascript code.
> > bin/xterm    is intended for the perl/Tk port
> > bin/console  is intended for a straight console port
> >
> > This way you are not forced to use any particular browser. If there will
> > ever be something specific for IE then I can always add bin/ie and have
> > all the IE code in this directory.
> >
> >
> > Dieter Simader    http://www.sql-ledger.org   (780) 472-8161
> > DWS Systems Inc.     Accounting Software       Fax: 478-5281
> > =========== On a clear disk you can seek forever ===========
> >
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, John Summerfield wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 03:03, Dieter Simader wrote:
> > > > mozilla is a catch all do GUI browser framed frontend
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The Javascript port will go into bin/js and if one wants to run
> > > > Javascript then you'd pass terminal=js The menu, which is something
> > > > like your traditional "File", "Edit" pulldown menu on top is done but
> > > > it requires a lot of horsepower to run.
> > >
> > > Please do not confuse the name of the browser with capabilities it
> > > might have. I can't use my bank's Internet banking website because it
> > > uses javascript with special processing for IE and Netscape and no
> > > default. The result is a blank page.
> > >
> > > Even js-capable browsers may have it turned off.
> > >
> > > I support the notion of supporting Javascript, but don't tie its use to
> > > any browser. If someone comes up with a js-capable lynx, let them use
> > > it with no messing around.



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
-------------------------------------------------------
(un)subscribe: http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sql-ledger-users
Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Reply via email to