Re: [Sqlalchemy-users] optimistic concurrency WAS hibernate

[Rick Morrison]

On 3/30/06, Michael Bayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> so, better to use the version id
>option, which is very simple and easy to make efficient...the developer
>just adds a proper index to the version ID column.  works with BLOBs etc

STM that you don't even need an index on the version column, the update is already indexed by the primary key in this case. You're very likely to have very large % of dup values in the version col anyway.

Rick