Gustavo Niemeyer wrote: > Have you had a chance to look at the message I've sent regarding > the clustering scheme? Do you think something about the details > I've explained could be considered in these changes or would it > be too incompatible with the changes you're doing? >
Gustavo - I only had a brief look. However, the changes are making the whole thing more flexible than it was before, so I am sure your "engine-switching" scheme can be used. The MetaData which holds your tables can have its engine switched at any point, and the Session can also have overriding functionality added to do wahtever kind of translation might be desired. you can also maybe make a "clustered" engine that manages mulitple connections; its pretty open-ended. you should study the new code and see if you can come up with something. i want to focus on getting 0.2 to work fully and stick it in the trunk, and very importantly getting some basic docs down which is a daunting task at the moment. if you cant come up with anything, ill try to have a closer look at your desired implementation. - mike ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
