Hi again Michael,

> I only had a brief look.  However, the changes are making the whole
> thing more flexible than it was before, so I am sure your
> "engine-switching" scheme can be used.  The MetaData which holds your
> tables can have its engine switched at any point, and the Session can
> also have overriding functionality added to do wahtever kind of
> translation might be desired.  you can also maybe make a "clustered"
> engine that manages mulitple connections; its pretty open-ended.  you
> should study the new code and see if you can come up with something.

I will do that.

I'll reproduce here what we need in a more concise way to be easier
to grasp (and keep an eye on).

For client-side clustering we need to be able to have a single
class, with a single mapper, associated to more than one connection.
Not only globally at commit time (e.g. switching the whole engine),
but also per-instance (selecting the connection).

> i want to focus on getting 0.2 to work fully and stick it in the
> trunk, and very importantly getting some basic docs down which is a
> daunting task at the moment.  if you cant come up with anything, ill
> try to have a closer look at your desired implementation.

Thank you very much.

On my side I'll try to follow your changes and come up with
something.

-- 
Gustavo Niemeyer
http://niemeyer.net


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users

Reply via email to