Michael Bayer wrote:
lets collaborate, but lets come up with some semblance of a real spec first. this before cracking open SQLAlchemy which in any case would only be one particular implementation of many possible ones, and shouldnt have to change its filestructure and release schedule around just to meet a particular API specifcation.
I think there was some confusion about what was being proposed. We weren't proposing refactoring SQLAlchemy, which certainly would hold up your progress for an unknown benefit. Regardless of the repository, this is really intended as an extraction, and probably from more projects than just SQLAlchemy. If SQLAlchemy later finds that extracted library useful, then great, you might want to do some refactoring or adapting to make use of it, but no one is expecting that to happen now or on any particular schedule, and SQLAlchemy isn't at a stage where a speculative refactoring makes much sense.
-- Ian Bicking | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://blog.ianbicking.org ------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
