Clark C. Evans wrote:
[cut short - sorry]
How does this impact SQLAlchemy? Well, frankly, it need not if you so
choose. However, I think it would be a huge boon to SQLAlchemy if you
all wanted to play along. Assuming that the project was bootstrapped
from some of your existing modules:
- you'd have one more set of eyes on the code, in particular
one that is pouring over the specifications and implementations
- the result will be heavily documented (frankly, it is lightly
documented at the current time)
Documentation in this project is exceptional by my standards i.e It
helps me complete my work without asking a thousand questions on the
mailing list and or reading tutorials/blogs on the web. What more can
you want.
- it will no doubt be improved in many substantial ways
Of course SA can be improved; Michael and team (is there a team ?) are
working on it as we speak.
- it will probably be quite close to what you already have, so
changing your code to use it shouldn't be a huge effort
(Igor might even do it, but it's not required)
Damn right it'll be close to SA. Now that I think about, maybe it'll
require no work at all on SA's part ;-)
There's one thing in this whole discussion which is eluding me.
What features of SQL does SA lack in which SQL-API will help it solve ?
regards
Huy
-------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Sqlalchemy-users mailing list
Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
