On Jun 14, 2006, at 1:50 PM, Jonathan LaCour wrote: > Does this changeset make it so that ActiveMapper doesn't have to jump > through a bunch of hoops to make sure that tables/mappers are > processed > in a particular order for relationship dependencies? >
probably. it would be very helpful for you to get the latest trunk and try it out. its a pretty major change to the mapper internals. _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
