Michael Bayer wrote: > well i can just put the string thing in, and i generally wont mention > it much.
Thats fine with me. > if we're putting in strings, shouldnt people be able to specify > modulenames as well ? i.e. "somemodule.SomeClass" ? Sure, that would work fine. In ActiveMapper, I will just be passing whatever the user passes into the ActiveMapper.relationship subclasses (one_to_one, one_to_many, many_to_many). Let me know if and when you do this, and I will make the necessary changes to ActiveMapper and test them out. -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
