Kevin Dangoor wrote: > It seems to me that an implicit integer primary key would be a nice > feature for ActiveMapper. If a primary key is defined, of course, that > wouldn't be added... but for brand new databases, an int primary key > makes good sense and is easy to work with.
This would certainly make ActiveMapper more SQLObject-like, which would probably be a good thing since they have the same target audience. I would like this very much as long as there is a way to disable it. Are you planning on implementing this, or are you asking if someone is willing to do it? -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Sqlalchemy-users mailing list Sqlalchemy-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sqlalchemy-users
