Michael Bayer wrote: > Ilias Lazaridis wrote: > > I've understood that SA can be used to produce an SQLObject compatible > > layer: > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/89dc84b2e9d9d860 > > > > maybe you have some comments to this thread. > > as was mentioned in the thread, ActiveMapper allows a declarative > approach that is similar to SQLObject, and emulates some of its > behavior, but it still does things very differently. Yes, you could > build something that behaved more identically to SQLObject, but it > would probably not perform very well due to the complexity such a > project would entail. Better off just using SQLObject itself.
I don't discuss the option to use SQLObject. The thread I've pointed you to (and which is essentially ignored by turbogears community), discusses essentially the abilities of SQLA and SQLO. Can I have at least a direct (=technical) answer to this one?: " http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2006-September/359164.html "SQLAlchemy implements the Data Mapper pattern, of which the Active Record pattern (which SQLObject implements) is a subset." I understand this like this: SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) can implement SQLObject (Active Record) SQLObject (Active Record) cannot implement SQLAlchemy (DataMapper) " --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
