Rick Morrison wrote: > > The core can (and does) use these buckets too, so I'm not sure > about the > > user-y moniker. > > Hold it. I thought the whole point of this was to separate core usage > from user usage? To create a "safe-zone" for library user's private data.
Yes to the second but not exactly the first. The goal is a stable bucket for everyone's annotations- end-user, apps, 3rd party extensions, internal extensions, etc. Keeping annotations separate is just a matter of namespacing in the dict keys- the tuple-style SA currently uses and the dotted-string style the WSGI 'environ' uses both work well. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
