That sounds reasonable to me; my knee-jerk thought was that we might need to worry about memory usage, but these references are only on low-count instances like tables, columns, sessions and mappers, not ORM object instances.
On 10/31/07, Paul Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Ah sure, so it's to be a namespace for namespaces, a shared dict() parking > > lot. Got it. > > > > How about having two dicts? One is purely for user data, libraries and > such never touch it. I suggest "userdata". > > The other is for use in extensions and stuff, say "extdata". > > Paul > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sqlalchemy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
