the problem is that it shouldn't just be taken into account for 
relationships but all queries that operate on such a table with the flag

On Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:22:29 PM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote:
>
> Also in the relationship docs, see relationship to non primary mapper, 
> which illustrates how to make ad-hoc relationships to subqueries, though 
> typically relationship to target where deleted=false is just a custom 
> primary join condition, a subquery is probably not needed here. 
>
> Sent from my iPhone 
>
> > On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:25 AM, Simon King 
> > <si...@simonking.org.uk<javascript:>> 
> wrote: 
> > 
> > That wiki page also links to: 
> > 
> >  https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/wiki/UsageRecipes/GlobalFilter 
> > 
> > which is intended to work with relationships as well, but it seems a 
> > lot more complicated. 
> > 
> > Another option might be to map to a SELECT, rather than directly to a 
> table. 
> > 
> >  
> http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/mapper_config.html#mapping-a-class-against-arbitrary-selects
>  
> > 
> > The docs discourage mapping to a select because of the complexity of 
> > the resulting queries, but in your case perhaps those queries are 
> > exactly what is required. 
> > 
> > Hope that helps, 
> > 
> > Simon 
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:06 PM, RonnyPfannschmidt 
> > <ronny.pfa...@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote: 
> >> 
> >> im already aware of that, but it doesnt expand to relationships and 
> other 
> >> things 
> >> basically i need it taken into account in a lot more places 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:59:21 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote: 
> >>> 
> >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:44 AM, RonnyPfannschmidt 
> >>> <ronny.pfa...@gmail.com> wrote: 
> >>>> Hi, 
> >>>> 
> >>>> im working on a project where in many tables data can not be deleted, 
> >>>> but 
> >>>> only marked as deactivated, 
> >>>> Propperly handling selection of active data for normal users and all 
> >>>> data 
> >>>> for admins is turning more and more tendious (in particular wrt 
> >>>> relationship 
> >>>> configuration) 
> >>>> 
> >>>> Im wondering if there is a way to configure mappers/queries to 
> >>>> automatically 
> >>>> take such flags into account. 
> >>>> 
> >>>> -- Ronny 
> >>> 
> >>> Perhaps something like this might help: 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> 
> https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/wiki/UsageRecipes/PreFilteredQuery 
> >>> 
> >>> Simon 
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups 
> >> "sqlalchemy" group. 
> >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an 
> >> email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> >> To post to this group, send email to 
> >> sqlal...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>. 
>
> >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. 
> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "sqlalchemy" group. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
> an email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. 
> > To post to this group, send email to 
> > sqlal...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>. 
>
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. 
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. 
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to