you have to roll it yourself. query subclass + relationship + whatever else.
On Feb 27, 2014, at 10:35 AM, RonnyPfannschmidt <ronny.pfannschm...@gmail.com> wrote: > the problem is that it shouldn't just be taken into account for relationships > but all queries that operate on such a table with the flag > > On Thursday, February 27, 2014 3:22:29 PM UTC+1, Michael Bayer wrote: > Also in the relationship docs, see relationship to non primary mapper, which > illustrates how to make ad-hoc relationships to subqueries, though typically > relationship to target where deleted=false is just a custom primary join > condition, a subquery is probably not needed here. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:25 AM, Simon King <si...@simonking.org.uk> wrote: > > > > That wiki page also links to: > > > > https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/wiki/UsageRecipes/GlobalFilter > > > > which is intended to work with relationships as well, but it seems a > > lot more complicated. > > > > Another option might be to map to a SELECT, rather than directly to a > > table. > > > > > > http://docs.sqlalchemy.org/en/rel_0_9/orm/mapper_config.html#mapping-a-class-against-arbitrary-selects > > > > > > The docs discourage mapping to a select because of the complexity of > > the resulting queries, but in your case perhaps those queries are > > exactly what is required. > > > > Hope that helps, > > > > Simon > > > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 1:06 PM, RonnyPfannschmidt > > <ronny.pfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> im already aware of that, but it doesnt expand to relationships and other > >> things > >> basically i need it taken into account in a lot more places > >> > >> > >>> On Thursday, February 27, 2014 10:59:21 AM UTC+1, Simon King wrote: > >>> > >>> On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 8:44 AM, RonnyPfannschmidt > >>> <ronny.pfa...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> im working on a project where in many tables data can not be deleted, > >>>> but > >>>> only marked as deactivated, > >>>> Propperly handling selection of active data for normal users and all > >>>> data > >>>> for admins is turning more and more tendious (in particular wrt > >>>> relationship > >>>> configuration) > >>>> > >>>> Im wondering if there is a way to configure mappers/queries to > >>>> automatically > >>>> take such flags into account. > >>>> > >>>> -- Ronny > >>> > >>> Perhaps something like this might help: > >>> > >>> > >>> https://bitbucket.org/zzzeek/sqlalchemy/wiki/UsageRecipes/PreFilteredQuery > >>> > >>> > >>> Simon > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > >> "sqlalchemy" group. > >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > >> email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com. > >> To post to this group, send email to sqlal...@googlegroups.com. > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "sqlalchemy" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to sqlalchemy+...@googlegroups.com. > > To post to this group, send email to sqlal...@googlegroups.com. > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sqlalchemy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sqlalchemy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sqlalchemy@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlalchemy. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
