"Mike Bayer" <[email protected]> writes:
> these look super great!
Thanks! I will then open an issue and a related PR shortly.
> We can make the text("") statements into something nicer in a second
> pass, is that the part you didn't like ?
Not exactly: I spent some time trying to avoid the "redundancy" in the
tests parametrization, ie
@testing.combinations(
(Range(empty=True), 'empty'),
(Range(None, None, bounds='()'), '(,)'),
(Range(None, 4, bounds='(]'), '(,4]'),
...
ideally simplifying it to
@testing.combinations(
Range(empty=True),
Range(None, None, bounds='()'),
Range(None, 4, bounds='(]'),
...
and then being able to "compute" the SQL query from the given Range
instance alone, but I couldn't figure out how to obtain the
"compilation" of just a single value from the connection.dialect.
But hey, I do not expected those arguments will be changing often... :-)
ciao, lele
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
[email protected] | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
--
SQLAlchemy -
The Python SQL Toolkit and Object Relational Mapper
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/
To post example code, please provide an MCVE: Minimal, Complete, and Verifiable
Example. See http://stackoverflow.com/help/mcve for a full description.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sqlalchemy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sqlalchemy/874jvtukxz.fsf%40metapensiero.it.
