Gaetan de Menten wrote: > Ok, a little later than expected, I've comitted this to the trunk > along with some tests and a bit of doc. I've opted for "attribute" for > the second argument. What do you think?
It seems to work great for me. It bothers me a little bit that we are inconsistent now though. You use `has_many(through=..., via=...)` or `has_field(through=..., attribute=...)`, which is a little odd. Why can't we make them use the same kwarg? -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SQLElixir" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
