Gaetan de Menten wrote:

>> Okay, I can see your point.  I still prefer standardizing on "via"
>> but I can live with the way it is now, so lets stick with it.
>
> I prefer the current situation but I can live with "via" ;-).

Well, if its not objectionable to you, can we err on the side of
consistency, and standardize on the "via" kwarg?

> Actually, I wanted to have this too. I *think* AssociationProxy should
> work fine in that situation, though I never tested that case. And, if
> it doesn't we should (at least try to) fix/enhance AssociationProxy,
> not do an Elixir-specific hack.

Yeah, agreed.  Do you want to take a look at this, or shall I?

--
Jonathan LaCour
http://cleverdevil.org


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"SQLElixir" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sqlelixir?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to