unsubscribe
On Oct 17, 2003, at 1:24 AM, Paul Smith wrote:
At 19:43 16/10/2003, Bernie Cosell wrote:
On 16 Oct 2003 at 17:08, Paul Smith wrote:
> At 16:44 16/10/2003, you wrote:
> >I prefer the 'reply to sender' default rather than
> >'reply to all'. ...
> It really depends what you see the purpose of the list being.
>
> If replies only go back to the original message sender, then there
are
> quite a few disadvantages:
The problem with this is that it presumes [by your use of 'only']
that the list
membership is either entirely [or primarily] made of folk who cannot
manage to
do anything fancier/cleverer with their email clients than hit
"reply". now,
if you had said that "..._some_ replies will go back
...unintentionally..."
that'd be closer to the fact, I think...
I'm not too fussed either way - but I find it much more convenient to
have 'reply-to-list'
(One of the things that REALLY annoys me is receiving duplicate emails
- you'll notice that if I reply to a list where I have to reply-all,
then I'll always edit the To/Cc fields so it only goes back to the
list.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
