Christian Kienle wrote:
"Use the sqlite_open function to open an existing SQLite database or to create
a new SQLite database. The first argument is the database name. The second
argument is intended to signal whether the database is going to be used for
reading and writing or just for reading. But in the current implementation,
the second argument to sqlite_open is ignored."
Is there a date or a time which is left until this feature (the second
argument) will be implemented? We don't need this feature but if it will be
there we need to integrate it - this means for us: changing the source code.
It would be cool to know when this feature is implemented that we could put
this on our todo list.
There are no plans to ever do anything with the second argument to
sqlite_open().
SQLite version 3 is currently under development. sqlite3_open() will
have a flexible mechanism to specify options. It will not have the
second parameter currently found on sqlite_open().
--
D. Richard Hipp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 704.948.4565
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
