Hi, at first thank you for the information you gave us.
> There are no plans to ever do anything with the second argument to > sqlite_open(). Ah okay... > SQLite version 3 is currently under development. sqlite3_open() will > have a flexible mechanism to specify options. It will not have the > second parameter currently found on sqlite_open(). Will the API change much? What do you think -> do we need to rewrite much code if we use the function with the callback method? Greets Christian Kienle --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
