I drink to that!

2017-06-10 14:26 GMT-04:00 Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com>:

>
> > On Jun 10, 2017, at 6:58 AM, Daniel Anderson <woni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > the article was integers (4 bytes) vs guid as a primary key, which as
> > string takes 36 bytes. so he was right in saying that string guid/uuid
> take
> > 9 time the space of simple integers.
>
> Ah, that explains where he got 9x. I still think it’s an unfair
> comparison, given the inefficient encoding of the UUID (it should be a
> 16-byte blob.) And in any design problem that’s at sufficient scale that
> you’re even considering UUIDs, a 32-bit primary key isn’t going to be
> sufficient, so it should be 64-bit. Now we’re down to a 2x difference.
>
> > in general the article was quite good and allowed people to ponder about
> > their choices/beliefs.
>
> I would have been less critical, had the author identified that the
> subject domain is traditional RDBMSs. Instead the implication is that this
> is relevant to any database, which it isn’t.
>
> Anyway, arguing about databases is boring. It’s the weekend — I’m off to
> play guitar and go to parties ;-)
>
> —Jens
> _______________________________________________
> sqlite-users mailing list
> sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
> http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
>



-- 
Daniel
*L'action accède à la perfection quand, bien que vivant, vous êtes déjà
mort*
*Bunan*
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to