> perhaps the devs can invent some other namespace
Seconded. I would like to think the devs, themselves, would like to create
some sort of namespace or isolation for the structures created by the
extensions. A little more gusto in the name, rather than STMT, would always
be appreciated. imo
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:31 AM, Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org> wrote:
> On 14 Jul 2017, at 8:50am, Clemens Ladisch <clem...@ladisch.de> wrote:
> > There already is an "sqlite_" namespace, and it is reserved for internal
> > objects of SQLite itself.
> > The STMT virtual table is an extension that must be explicitly enabled.
> > (The sqlite3 command-line shell does so by default, but it already did
> > with other extensions like fileio, and it does not actually have the
> > same API stability guarantees as the SQLite library.)
> Then perhaps the devs can invent some other namespace for this new
> category of thing. I don’t mind what the name is, I would just like the
> entity to be clearly marked as not one of mine. The ability to filter out
> names including underline characters is very useful.
> sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users mailing list