Simone Mosciatti wrote: > it is suggested in several place to don't share a connection between forks.
Because of how locking and file handles interact. > However I fail to see how this can be a problem for purely in-memory database. In-memory databases do not use a file handle or file locking. > Different point if the database is backed by a regular file, however, > in such case, couldn't I simply close the connection in the child fork(2) says that | the child does not inherit process-associated record locks from its | parent (fcntl(2)). (On the other hand, it does inherit fcntl(2) open | file description locks and flock(2) locks from its parent.) So closing the child's handle can break the parent's locks. Regards, Clemens _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
