>>> Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 16:46:48 +1000 >>> From: D Burgess <mailto:dburges...@gmail.com> >>> >>> Is there a historical reason why sqlite does not have a UNSIGNED type to go >>> with INTEGER?
I would like to enthusiastically second not only this as a feature request, but also request arbitrary-length (or at least much longer length) INTEGER values, as are possible in other SQL dialects. There may have been a time in the past when 63 bits was all one could ever conceivably need, but I think we have moved past that time now. E.g., I have a common need to store software address values, which are (currently!) 64-bit unsigned, and have had to jump through ridiculous hoops in SQLite to do it. Integers in this range, and larger, seem like they are in common use today. Randall. _______________________________________________ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users
