+1 for that or a true bignum support (i.e. without any length restriction). The 
latter would be perfect as it would provide support for storing numbers of 
encryption keys (RSA, etc.). And it would also avoid the problem of having to 
extend the bigint range again in a couple of years.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: Simon Slavin <slav...@bigfraud.org>
To: SQLite mailing list <sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2018, 20:06:38
Subject: [sqlite] Unsigned

On 22 Aug 2018, at 6:04pm, Jens Alfke <j...@mooseyard.com> wrote:

> Bignums make unsigned types irrelevant, if the only reason you need unsigned 
> is to store 64-bit positive integers. As others have said, "unsigned" is a 
> constraint, not a type.

Agreed.

> Bignums would be nice; but you could implement them yourself by storing them 
> as blobs and defining functions to operate on them, which would call into 
> some available C bignum library.

What seems to be needed here is not BIGNUM but would better be called BIGINT.  
However, IMHO SQLite should not complicate itself by incorporating a new 
datatype.  That would lead to a lot of extra CAST() programming and testing.   
Instead it should expand the capabilities of the existing INTEGER type.  
Looking at section 2.1 of <https://www.sqlite.org/datatype3.html> suggests 
using a new Serial Type code of, for the sake of argument, 10 to mean "Value is 
a big-endian 128-bit twos-complement integer.".

This would create schema format 5, and introduce a possible compatibility 
problem if a database with a big integer was presented to an earlier version of 
SQLite.  But I think it would represent the minimum of backward compatibility 
problems.  But I haven't read the source code so I don't know for sure.

Simon.
_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to